DTB Cup - in which I have a moan about the desultory state of WAG
The first time ever I saw the USSR gymnasts
But I loved gymnastics and I wanted to see my favourite, Olga Korbut. My friends Elaine Richardson, Janet Brooks and Mary Andronowski wanted to come too.
We set out in the school coach, all of us excited. I wore my best purple dress and purple eye shadow and had my little Kodak camera in my bag. I remember the excitement when we arrived and parked up at Wembley, only a few steps away from the Trident studio where rock band Queen had recorded some of their first album! I half expected to see them there :-).
We found our seats, up in the higher echelons of the Grand Tier. There was a strong smell of popcorn. Scampering school children made the boards beneath our feet echo, seats around us snapped up and down, lending the impression of an ever moving sea rather than an attentive audience. But I was transfixed. It was my first time to see gymnastics live; I wanted to experience the magic of Korbut and her team up close.
Then - bang! - the lights went down and we were plunged into blackness. 'Wooooooooo!!!' The sudden darkness stilled us all and imposed a feeling of anticipation - then the spotlights began circling the arena; the band began playing; and finally, the announcer introduced the triumphant team. Olga, with her smile; Lioudmilla, waving to the crowd, all the gymnasts perfectly turned out, smartly marching in, wearing their navy blue tracksuits! I can still hum the tune - that smell, those sounds, immediately take me back over forty years. I learned to stamp my feet, to clap my hands till they were sore. And for weeks afterwards there was only one subject of conversation. I read the programme (picture; look at the creases and crinkles!) till the pages feel apart and can still recite some of the content by rote. For example, a profile of gymnast Paata Shamugia, whose coach Leonid Arkaev had 'informed the boy that gymnastics would be his main occupation from now on', rather than football.
Olga, Nelli, Liudmilla, Maria and Elvira; Alexander and Nikolai; the marching band and the smell of popcorn are always there, the heart and soul of my gymnastics. The pyrotechnics of today's competition experiences may be more expensive, but they will never be more special than my very first gymnastics dream come true - seeing the Soviet gymnasts in person.
This floor routine is from a US Display in the same year - but you get the impression and a little bit of the joyful, informal feeling that was characteristic of these events. Olga Korbut was more than an entertainer - more than somebody who simply captured hearts. Look at her line, precision, the beauty of her movements. She was an innovator, a truly artistic gymnast. And even though the 'stunts' she performed - daring, risky and inventive - caused controversy and disapproval in parts of her home country and amongst some of the wider gymnastics community, she never lost that special polish that distinguished the outstanding from the excellent. The genius of these gymnasts was how they made the impossible look simple; they were consummate performers for whom the technical and difficult was merely the fundamental, basic requirement of a routine. They were more than just athletes wanting to win; they competed with grace and elegance to elevate gymnastics to an art form. We can learn much from them today.
Club Pushkin, home of World Champion gymnast Elena Eremina, faces collapse
Korbut/Knysh rape allegations resurface
Heroes are only human
Three generations - Nabiyeva, Melnikova, Simakova.
Mustafina and Grebyonkin
Gorbatova with bars coach Sergei Andrianov
Andrei Rodionenko has implemented some great strategies since Rio that have seen the teams strengthened, and established a calm determination to their work. A new generation of coaches is asserting itself under his leadership.
Dalolyan, happy as Russian AA champion (as he predicted!)
Angelina Simakova, this year's promise. Simakova's floor routine, cute and shy, showed a few glimpses of Ksenia Afanasyeva's influence as coach-choreographer- although I am sure that this is just a start.
Angelina Melnikova, who has flowered this spring
Maria Paseka looks as comfortable as coach as competitor - she was here this week on the floor with Seda Tutkhalyan.
Russia WAG head to Mallorca for their annual active retreat - Eremina with them!
Gymnastics in post-Soviet Russia : ISSA Conference 2018
I attended the second gathering of the group ISCWAG (International Socio-Cultural Research into women's artistic gymnastics), which is a relatively newly assembled group of academics from all over the world. You can find profiles of the founder members here. This year the papers focussed on such subjects as the coach-gymnast relationship and grooming; gender-based violence and gymnastics coaching, and the pattern of older gymnasts continuing to compete in the sport. There was also a 'keynote' introductory presentation on the development of a research tree to map areas of inquiry into our sport. I gave a presentation on WAG in post-Soviet Russia.
It is interesting to see how much research is going on into sport and in particular artistic gymnastics, and ICSWAG group members are concerned to engage with the realities and to embrace and encourage positive change in the sport, especially in light of the developing, global, worries about abuse. I can give you a link to the book of abstracts for the conference, and you will find the artistic gymnastics pages at 26, 27, 41 and 42. It was a great conference - with thanks to Natalie, Roslyn, and all who made it possible.
My work at present is to try to tell a story of gymnastics in the Russian Federation from its inception in 1992 to the present day. Based on the interview Alexander Alexandrov gave me in 2013, and on multiple, almost daily conversations with Soviet senior national coach Vladimir Zaglada, I wanted to look at the development of gymnastics in post-Soviet Russia and try to explain how global and local changes in the political and economic environment have affected the institution of sports and in particular artistic gymnastics in Russia. I also make reference to in depth press interviews between Russia's leading sports journalist Elena Vaitsekhovskaya and Russian head coaches, Leonid Arkayev and Andrei Rodionenko. These interviews were undertaken at times that were figural in the dismantling of the 'old' system and the establishment, or re-establishment, of the 'new'.
The whole story will be covered in a book I am planning. The presentation shows some interim conclusions of work in progress. In brief, Russia has moved forward to embrace a participation model for the sport (as opposed to the selection model of the Soviet Union) but without the economic prosperity to back this up, the seeding and nurturing of young gymnasts at grass roots level simply isn't happening at scale. There are no longer the numbers to create a strong reserve. The Soviet-era commodification of sports for political purposes has been replaced by an ethic that favours sport for its economic multiplier effects (realised through the staging of mega-events) and puts the financial success of sporting mega-stars on a pedestal. A few people manage to make their living through gymnastics, but the majority struggle, or fail, to make ends meet.
President Putin's ambition to re-awaken national pride through sport and to recapture the 'magnificent glories' of Soviet sport has animated some wonderful sponsors such as VTB, who have given billions of Roubles to sport and enabled, not least, the refurbishment of one of the world's leading national training centres at Lake Krugloye. But the funding is incredibly top-heavy. While the coaches at the national sports centre are paid well enough, coaches at grass roots receive below-subsistence wages. There is no strong programme of scientific research into gymnastics in Russian universities, and thus there is a developing intellectual deficit amongst the increasingly scarce, rapidly ageing gymnastics coaching community. Even though national senior coaches such as Andrianov, Grebyonkin, Alfosov and Kiryashov - in fact the whole team at Lake Krugloye, and the personal coaches of the national team members - have the mettle and track record to stand proudly amongst the best coaches in the world, the sheer scale of Russia makes this a spit in the ocean compared to what is needed to encourage recruitment and retention of young gymnasts and create a sustainable legacy of up and coming coaches and champions. This isn't only about money. Alexandrov spoke about changes to the Master of Sports programme needed to encourage gymnasts to stay in the sport whether they trained in Kazan, Moscow or Novosibirsk.
The internecine conflict that has been in evidence in the Russian programme - which Nelli Kim referred to as self destructive - stems from the stresses that Russia is experiencing as it adjusts to the changed cultural and economic environment of state capitalism. It is not really surprising that at a sporting level there are arguments over how to achieve the best outcome with limited talent coming to the bank at Lake Krugloye. Alexandrov's ambitious rhetoric of gold has been overshadowed by Rodionenko's quiet determination to work more strategically to create a team that will remain competitive at the top level. Whose approach is better? Alexandrov only had four years to make his case, and we only need time to tell if Rodionenko's approach is working.
The only surprising thing is that Russia has hung on to its high international ranking for so long. Romania managed to sustain gold medals with only a handful of gymnasts for a very long time, but this was dependent on the fiery passion of Octavian Belu and was extinguished almost immediately he left the team. It is remarkable how one person can provide leadership and make all the difference to a gymnastics programme.
I don't want to make all of my presentation public at this stage, but I will give you the first and last slides. As ever, please do comment!
Boris Orlov, coach to World Champion Olga Bicherova, has died
Elena Shushunova, the greatest of all time, has died at the age of 49
Bloggers beware!
It has recently come to my attention that someone has been copying my blog - yes, in its entirety. In fact there are a number of blogs out there purporting to be me. This is not only very annoying - the blog represents six years of very hard work - it is also plagiarism, and a legal breach of my copyright in my writing and presentation of the work.
I am happy if people refer to my blog and give credit, but not to be plagiarised lock, stock and barrel, and I will be pursuing this matter to try to set things straight. In the meantime, please note that the only real Rewriting Russian Gymnastics blog is here.
Gymnastics, doping and abuse
The three themes that regularly emerge are corruption, cheating and cruelty, or a combination of all three. Sports politics, at various levels local, regional, national and international, are an overarching consideration, as are gender and racial issues. Most sports are funded by national and local governments on one level or another. Corporate organisations sponsor sports. Sporting federations wrangle for power. Coaches fight for prominence. Sports relationship to medicine, injury and recovery is currently emphasised as never before. The battle has become as much one of the doctors as of the athletes. Perhaps the purest part of sport is the action that goes on in the competitive arena.
The sociological context of sport differs from person to person, country to country and sport to sport. The framework of political influences begins at a personal level for the athlete, escalating up through the hierarchies of sports coaching and admin, and back down from governmental level through to the preparation of child athletes in gymnasia and athletics grounds. Sports 'politics' has a capital 'P' and a lower case 'p'. Political context (with a capital letter) informs the way sport operates and identifies itself and influences sport's structures and position in society. Sports politics (with a lower case p) is the way that individual sports respond to the environment and go about delivering society's expectations. All political systems influence sport, and all of human behaviour takes place within the theatre of sport.
Sport is part of an international network of friendship and rivallry. The Olympics are a unique part of global society in that they bring together athletes from all over the world. In no other arena but sport and the Olympics does the world come together in this way. In no other way are the talents of individuals showcased, wherever they come from and whatever they do.
Sports and the Olympics have not only become an important part of diplomacy and warfare, they have also become a voice and a branding tool for corporations. Sport as a meritocracy encourages meanings of ethics etc
Catch up with Russian gymnastics
1 The continuing depletion of the national team reserve.
MAG head coach Valery Alfosov has stressed that although the men's team appears to be thriving at present, this does not reflect a complete turn round in Russia's fortunes. There are concerns that the longer term development of the team will be erratic.
Conditions in WAG seem highly uncertain. The national team relies on maintaining its veterans to ensure the appearance of being in contention for individual medals. Without Paseka and Mustafina the team would have only Ilyankova and Melnikova as gymnasts of medal potential. Furthermore, the measure of Mustafina is purely reputational. There is little evidence that she will return to competition at her previous level, and promising her appearance at the European Games could end up being little more than a favour to Russia fans anxious to encounter her much fabled competitive charisma.
Team success in gymnastics is about more than talent or the emergence of individuals. Strength in depth underpins the ability to maintain competitive profile and visibility as well as to cater for times when leaders are struck by injury. Russia is still an important gymnastics power internationally, but it does not have the same scale, volume and focus as it once had. Comparisons to the former, far larger Soviet Union, lead to a sense of disappointment about the prospects, but the changes are about more than mere numbers, and there are underlying shifts in attitude which perhaps add to the feeling of anticlimax that surrounds gymnastics in Russia at present, in particular WAG.
Female gymnasts no longer emerge as first year seniors to take the world by storm, as they did in the 1980s and early 1990s. World Champion in 1981, Olga Bicherova, began a pattern that sparked off similar early career victories from Shushunova in 1985, Dobre in 1987 and Zmeskal in 1991. In general, female gymnasts now take longer to establish themselves as seniors and win their first medals, and have longer career spans, choosing specialist or all around roles for themselves. This reflects changes in the sports rules as well as changing morals in the nature of training and competition, that in turn are reflected in the state-coach-gymnast power relationship. Russia has yet to adapt to this reality and loses a lot of promising juniors in the transition to full senior participation.
Many in the Russian-speaking community argue that this relates to the easy availability of money for those training on the national team. The rewards are adequate enough to encourage mediocrity, and travelling to the odd competition with friends is enjoyable at a certain level of engagement. Why tolerate increasingly hard training for a tenuous opportunity to win big?
This may explain the situation to some extent, but it goes beyond that to a general cooling down of the social climate in respect of the importance of sport. While Russia's sports dinosaurs are hardwired with the narrative of gold at all costs, their passionate words, rooted in a proud past, cannot be matched by a current social and sporting climate that is more about comfort than victory. Add to that the recent feeling of international isolation and mistrust brought about by the WADA mishandling of Russia's doping record, and there is enough to discourage real pride in a country's record in sport. Russia is not a rich country and the opportunity to earn a good living is enough in itself.
2 The flaking infrastructure
While conditions at the national centre, Round Lake, are good, the regions still struggle to maintain sufficient funding and focus to keep their facilities and coaching up to date. In the past twelve months major gymnastics centres in St Petersburg and Leninsk-Kuznetsk have been under threat of closure, or are temporarily closed while refurbishment takes place. This is not all bad. Some areas have experienced a renaissance, eg Rostov on Don which is the home of Nikita Nagorny, Maria Kharenkova, and several other national team members. It is, however, clear that the emphasis on the 'centre' does not provide continuity in the feeding of new talent onto the national team. While the provenance of gymnasts on the men's team is diverse, the women's team is now dominated by around half of its gymnasts who come from Moscow, St Petersburg and its surrounds.
The average age of the national team coaching staff is now younger than five years ago. There are regular changes in the personnel, for example, the recent appointment of Konstantin Pluzhnikov as bars coach. Valery Alfosov, who has been head coach of the MAG team for many years, has now established himself as a passionate leader: he is dry, supportive and visionary. The WAG coaching team is supportive, but seems to have little in the way of vision, leadership or passion.
3 The gymnastics
Soviet gymnastics was all about style, imagination and innovation. Those principles have re-established themselves in the leading MAG Russian gymnasts over the past few years, to the point that there is the potential for real medal success at the next Olympics, if we are lucky. Nagorny is the fiery, do-it-at-all-costs leader; Dalolyan has real style and deftness; Lankin is the emerging genius. I love to watch them compete, and the respect they pay each other and their rivals.
WAG in general is at a low point currently. It is great to watch competitions and to see the way the girls interact with each other; to see how the gymnasts strive to outdo themselves and each other over time. But there is little of excitement in the developing form of gymnastics. The gymnasts are not disappointing, but the Code allows them little encouragement and freedom to develop the sport creatively. The same tumbles and turns are in evidence on the floor and beam, vaulting has gone backwards for the majority of all arounders, and bars routines seem interchangeable. There are always exceptions, of course, but overall the sport has lost its way. The sport needs leadership to overcome the current impasse and re-establish variety, virtuosity and balance. At present artistry and power have become divided. Power outranks artistry. The best gymnastics is a combination of both.
Artistry and power are not mutually exclusive and a pattern for the future needs to be established. There is a gap at the top of WAG for someone to take a lead. Why not Russia?
In the desperate grab for medals in an increasingly competitive sport, Russia has forgotten itself. Its sporting and cultural identity has always centred on the imposition of a graceful style and elegance within the form of whatever practice it is undertaking. During World War 2, Shostakovich transmitted an emotional performance of a symphony, composed and played in St Petersburg during the blocade. Surrounded by blood, death, famine and unimaginable suffering the Russian cultural capital produced some of the most beautiful and moving music the world could imagine. Why? 'We wanted to prove that despite all the suffering we were not just surviving, but that we had maintained our culture, that we were more than surviving', said one witness. In the same way, Russian sport, Soviet sport before it, has often overcome the boundaries of sporting competition to become an artistic form of sport. The Soviet ice hockey team of the 1980s won many medals but they didn't just impress with wins; their play was mesmerising, creating intricate patterns of play that could be enjoyed in the same way as dance. And the Soviet and Russian gymnasts also created art from the earlier discipline and military traditions of world gymnastics.
Russia still has the delicacy of touch that can make for beautiful, watchable gymnastics: think of Dalolyan as one who combines this with the necessary technical aplomb and difficulty to be a world beater. On the women's side, Elena Eremina and Angelina Simakova both embrace the elegance of the Russian tradition. They are typically Russian, and in many ways the best that Russia can produce, the gymnasts who reflect Russia's gymnastics heritage and identity. But they cannot perform the difficulty needed to consistently win medals at world level. Russia's best is not good enough at the moment. In the context of a sport that has lost its way, Russia has bolted and followed the crowd, abandoned its tradition of excellence in the pursuit of power and difficulty. Has lost sight of its true strength, technical gymnastics performed with elegance, gymnastics that transcends itself.
Boris Pilkin found a way to create gymnastics for his slight, skinny athlete, Svetlana Khorkina, that together with her technical brilliance and sheer will power made her into a legend. What Russia now needs is another coach, another Boris Pilkin for example, who can construct routines for gymnasts like Eremina and Simakova, Russia's finest, that will eventually become a model of leading gymnastics for the world to follow. It will be a precarious path. It will take at least a decade. Who can do this? When?
Komova v Douglas 2012
The 2012 quad was a curious point in gymnastics history. Russia had made their rush for world lead in 2010, but wouldn’t have got the gold in Rotterdam without the help of mistakes from the USA team. Mustafina was ready to rule the world, took her gold AA, but was then wiped out by an injury early in 2011 that presaged the fall of her team in 2012.
With Mustafina, Komova and Afanasyeva the Russians had the team but not the confidence to consolidate their leadership in London. Fights between the coaches diluted the momentum of 2010, one of their best gymnasts (2011 Euro Champ Dementyeva) was inexplicably sent home early from the main training camp leaving the team with a frightened and demoralised lead off, and what should have been a new dawn for Russian and world gymnastics instead proved to be nothing more than a sweet dream.
Komova, however, legitimately had a claim for gold in 2012 - the main one, not the minor prizes. Having been close to it in 2011, London was her opportunity for a big hoorah. Sadly, it didn’t happen.
Komova is the most cheated Olympic gymnast of all time.* Her silver medal in 2011 provoked audible gasps of indignation. A low landing in her final tumble was judged more harshly than a break in form on UB from her main rival and AA world champion that time, Jordyn Wieber. It was a close run thing, but Komova had felt like the winner. Wieber was favoured in the scores though - one of those uncomfortable outcomes that made you feel that the rules were wrong.
In London, Komova was clearly the best AA gymnast if she could deliver. Not only were her D scores comparable to those of Douglas, her standard of execution was superior. But the scores on both vault and UB did not seem to treat the two gymnasts equally. Komova had a flawed vault but a perfect UB. Douglas had minor errors on vault and a .4 deficit in her UB D score. This should have left Komova in the lead by halfway, but instead the margins were eroded by what is known as ‘boxing’ in the E scores. The UB scores had seemed to favour the US team all week, and the AA final was no exception. An E score on floor of 9.1 for probably the best executed floor work of that quad gave no margin. Artistry deductions were not applied to Douglas for her lacklustre and unimaginative floor performance. The judges simply did not discriminate in favour of Komova’s superior work on three apparatus, leaving the vault deductions and Douglas’s generous UB score as the deciding outcome.
Even the senior judges agreed that the result was wrong. Their reference marks gave Komova the win.
Yes, there is always controversy and always will be controversy in our thankfully complex, subjectively judged sport. (Even if robots take over some of the measurement, there will still be arguments about the humanly judged parameters and settings.) But in this case there was more than an ounce of error made in favour of the Russian’s rival. Controversy often means a difference of opinion. That’s OK except for when the opinion doesn’t see the whole picture. And history often rewrites the story in favour of the victor. So we do not forget.
*well ok, perhaps without considering 2000, where arguably the whole field was cheated of a fair fight.y
Weren't we mesmerised by the promise of gold? Abuse in gymnastics I
I’ve questioned myself time and again about gymnastics, ever since the ‘Me Too’ messages began appearing on my Twitter feed. Are we, fans, culpable of supporting a sport which is inherently brutal? Have we elevated our sport because of the brutality involved in making it to the top? What is it about gymnastics that has somehow led to the tacit acceptance of abuse as a way of life?
Only a few years ago Dominique Moceanu published her book, calling out her parents and her coaches, the Karolyis, as abusive. Did we stop and listen? No. We labelled Dominique an ‘attention seeker’.
And what about ‘Little Girls in Pretty Boxes’? Did we rush to support the injured parties? Insist on a sports-wide review of coaching practice? No. There was a media storm and lots of huffs and puffs, but we never got round to blowing the house down.
At the end of the day, weren’t we mesmerised by the promise of gold?
Abuse has been hiding in plain view for decades, not just in gymnastics but in other areas of high performance including sports, ballet, circus, theatre. It is a global, long-standing problem that exists wherever young people rely on adults for instruction and support, and where high performance is the objective.
How do we moderate welfare and performance? What is our priority?
Changing the age at which gymnasts can begin competing has been suggested, but legislation or regulation has limited results in a global context. The FIG can make rules but national culture or governance can always find ways to sidestep or subvert the rules. Countries are the big villains. Collective culture muddies the waters and confuses priorities. National administrations cover up, encourage malpractice, force athletes and coaches to break rules. Collectively, we feel absolved of responsibility and cheer top performances, elevating others’ personal sacrifices to a kind of religion that we worship. We want to see the tiny underdog win, and so much the better if she shares our nationality. Who cares how a gymnast wins, as long as she fights for gold?
We still have to agree what the problem is. There is no internationally agreed definition of abuse. Abuse is relative. Levels of domestic violence in Russia are unknown. People, generally, don’t talk about it. In China, many people believe that hardship in childhood is essential to turn out responsible, strong adults.
Abuse is a time-bound concept. What was acceptable practice in the classroom, family or gym twenty years ago is not the same today. Society has taken steps forward, at different paces in different countries.
Even in the field of human rights and child rights – which you would consider fundamental – there is no internationally enforceable law. Countries opt into signing agreements and can be shamed into acting to reduce human right infringements. But what sanctions are available to enforce respect of international law? Why should sport be any different?
Social media gave a voice to individuals and enabled the ‘Me Too’ generation and the current discussion around how we can protect athletes. So far, however, that discussion is only taking place if you can speak English. If we want global solutions to global problems, we need to talk globally, and everyone has to be involved. But not everyone agrees that there is a problem to talk about.
Perhaps the most powerful tool we have to combate abuse in sports is to continue to talk about it and to break down national cultural barriers. To come to an understanding. No single rule change will create a globally safe sport environment until we can all agree what sport means, why it is important and how we decide where strict training finishes and abuse begins. No matter the age of the athlete, this is the Big Question.
Looked at another way, sport can provide a channel to work out our collective global attitude towards the rights of others. Gymnastics' problems do not exist in isolation but are a manifestation of our society.
Elizabeth Booth, 22nd November 2020
Russia on the Rise? A video narrative on WAG at the Russian nationals
My Olympic Hero - how will I name my hero in a sport full of heroes, in a Games full of heroes - in a world full of heroes?
My Olympic Hero
How will I name my hero in a sport full of heroes, in a Games full of heroes – in a world full of heroes?
The whole pretext of the 2020 Olympic Games is unique. Globally, the Covid pandemic made the Olympics a fearful, questionable, celebration of global survival, a memorial of so many lost. The Tokyo Games asked as many questions as it provided answers. Could we afford the luxury of an in person gathering to celebrate athletic achievement and to act out world harmony? At our first ever digital Olympics, how would the sport, the competition in the field, act out?
Our sport – artistic gymnastics – began the Games with an enormous dark cloud overhanging. Sport in general has become too big for its boots. Political, social and commercial issues far outweigh the wellbeing of athletes. The IOC, FIG, national federations, coaching and medical consortia have forgotten and abandoned their responsibility for athlete welfare. Sport has become commodified and its amateur roots have been lost. A massive power imbalance now exists globally. The clearest evidence of this is the physical and emotional abuse suffered by the American gymnasts while under the care of the USA Gymnastics Federation, USAG. This has turned into a global sporting catastrophe as we question the whole basis of elite sport and its win-at-all-costs mentality. The villains of this piece are the administrators, publicists, coaches, doctors, journalists, dignitaries and fans who have quietly allowed unkind practices, and lowered their eyes when abuse was in plain view. The heroes of this piece are, as always, the athletes who behaved themselves with such dignity as they lived through their nightmares, told their stories, then faced their fellow competitors with such warmth and generosity back on the competition floor, or wherever they lead their lives today.
The words ‘hero’ and ‘Tokyo Olympics’ can’t be spoken without mentioning Simone Biles. Of course, Simone is the real hero of these Games for the honesty and transparency of her withdrawal, for the natural joy she showed in supporting her fellow athletes from all over the world, and simply for showing us that world record breaking athletes are only human, after all. Simone shows us the true spirit of the Olympics (international peace and friendship) and I think her influence was seen on the competition floor as gymnasts shared joy in their sporting achievements, whether they won a medal or not.
We, the gymternet, deserve mention as we move into another phase and become established as part of the sport. One of the characteristics of these Games has been the diversity (style, nationality and/or ethnicity, ability) of the competitors. We have all been able to celebrate the achievements of our favourites; my personal high point was to see Rebecca Andrade medal in the AA and win the vault final after so many years in the shadows. Gold medallists in the women’s sport came from Russia, USA, Brazil, Belgium and China, in the men’s sport from Russia, Japan, Israel, Great Britain, China, South Korea. This year we all seem to have been able to find something to celebrate – is it that we are so grateful to have some sense of community again after so long in isolation?
One thing I didn’t like so much was the number of times gymnasts broke down in tears after their routines. I don’t like the thought that the stress and pressure of the Olympics led to so much pent-up emotion. Tears of joy are one thing. Competing at an Olympics is surely the high point of any athlete’s sporting career. But tears of despair on the Olympic floor seem to me to be inexpressibly sad, especially from ones so young. Perhaps I am just not being realistic here; but I wish there were a way that sports competition could be rendered more positive for the majority of competitors who don’t medal, or maybe don’t even make a final, or finish last. You won a place to compete at the Olympics, you finished in fourth place in a final, you completed your routines, you turned up and you trained really well, these are all things to celebrate. Every athlete at every competition is a winner.
So, finally, who is my Russian Olympic hero, the one whose contribution I want to elevate and celebrate and make a noise about? Russia found itself in an enviable position this year: it won both team finals. The last time this happened was in 2008 when China won double gold on home ground; before that, the Unified Team in 1992 (but there was only one Russian woman and one Russian man on each of these teams). This year, the Russian men won the team gold for the first time in 25 years (1996 was their first ever team gold, when the gymnasts arguably had benefitted from the legacy effect of training with the Soviet Union). The Russian women won gold as a team for the first time ever in my lifetime.
These victories represent huge psychological breakthrough moments for the teams, and in both cases gradual changes in the coaching teams have made a difference. Valery Alfosov is now the national coach for the men, Olga Bulgakova for the women, and in addition to their personal coaches at home the gymnasts are supported by large and continually evolving teams of specialists and medical staff at the national training centre. While Andrei and Valentina Rodionenko still remain in place (and no doubt had a huge influence on the way the coaching teams have developed), it is plain that fresh approaches have made the difference. Self-belief and prioritising the team, more than individual chances, are at the heart of Russian gymnastics for now. I am expecting that Andrei and Valentina will both receive huge recognition and reward from the Russian Government over the coming year as they gradually back into Honorary roles and, hopefully, a long and healthy retirement. Andrei has held the reins since 2006, at a time of great change in the sport internationally and locally, and has established a good team morale where gymnast welfare and health have been a priority. He has mentored a new generation of young coaches with fresh energy to transform into a modern, innovative and powerful team what could have become an aging and ailing system. At the same time as sports participation levels in Russia have plummeted, there has been development and investment across the regional gymnastics powerhouses of the largest land mass in the world. Russia could not even compete at this Olympics in its own right as it became a pariah-state following the findings of mass, state-sponsored doping in certain other sports disciplines. Gymnastics has kept a clean slate through all the years of Rodionenko’s leadership and now looks ready to keep fighting.
So there is significant reason for Russia to celebrate in gymnastics, and I’m going to have two heroes of Russian gymnastics this year, one for MAG and the other for WAG. For MAG my choice is David Belyavski. You all know the story of the men’s team gold: how Artur Dalaloyan showed immense courage to compete with a barely-healed Achilles tendon in order to help his team to gold; how Nikita Nagorny showed his best for the team and roared like a lion when his final score gave Russia the win. Truth is, they are all heroes, but Belyavski is my hero: for always turning up and competing at his best, and often beyond his best; for being the light, quiet gymnast of enormous style and perfection, the lithe cheetah in a team of fierce and fearsome tigers. For being a captain, a gentleman, a cool and calculating leader of loud, aggressive youngsters full of ambition. For providing foresight and a strategy on the competition floor, and lighting the fire of motivation when panic could easily have set in. For not complaining one little bit when his place in the AA was taken away by a younger, injured team member; for saying ‘sometimes it’s just not your day’ when he left his individual finals without a medal. For giving his gold medal to his little girl, Alyssia. Belyavski is my hero, because he’s an Olympian, through and through, and the team matters to him more than anything. Because, at the age of 29, he wants to keep training and competing. He is a hero for all times, past, present and future.
My second hero, for the women, is Viktoria Listunova. It’s a hard choice, because Angelina Melnikova too deserves recognition for her long-term contribution and the amazing work she put in as team captain. Slava Urazova, my ‘Boguinskaia’ of this team, was the best lead off gymnast Russia have had in many years, and deserves significant acclaim for her steady, well performed and expressive gymnastics, so unique in this age of the sport. But Listunova is my choice of hero, she is the one who has stolen my heart. Listunova because she is the youngest one, and the one in the end who gave her all when her team needed her. Listunova because she stepped up onto the beam at the most pressured moment of the team final and gave the Russians their best score on the apparatus, when other Russians would have surrendered. Listunova, because she performed the most forgotten, but most memorable, floor exercise of the team competition to put Melnikova into the right place to win the gold for the team. Listunova, because she didn’t complain about missing the AA final at all, even when her performances made her a favourite for the gold medal. Listunova because her potential for medals on bars, beam and floor all make her unique. Listunova because she dances on floor when others so often only pose; for her hands and arms, so expressive and mobile. For her little face, so strong and determined. For all the medals she will, hopefully, fight for in the future.
And for Russia, who remain my favourite team, in my favourite sport, for all time …
Is Nabieva a revolutionary? Towards a classification of Soviet and Russian gymnastics
2011 National Team Announced
Senior national team:
Ksenia Afanasyeva
Yulia Belokobylskaya
Anna Dementyeva
Yulia Inshina
Viktoria Komova
Ekaterina Kurbatova
Violetta Malikova
Ramilia Musina
Aliya Mustafina
Anna Myzdrikova
Tatiana Nabieva
Maria Paseka
Diana Sapronova
Ksenia Semenova
Reserve Gymnasts:
Anastasia Grishina
Maria Dunaeva
Kristina Kruglikova
Irina Sazonova
Anastasia Sidorova
Tatiana Solovyova
Maria Stepanova
Putin voices his commitment to sport
Vladimir Zaglada : One Coach's Journey from East to West
I have just ordered a copy from Amazon UK for £12.61 including Free Super Saver Delivery. This will definitely be my Easter holiday reading; it will probably find itself tucked into my handbag for the flight to and from Berlin!
It sounds as though it could be a little more digestible for the everyday reader than Leonid Arkaev's book, How to Create Champions.
Now what I would really like in addition to these two books is an autobiography of Leonid Arkaev, written in English. Oh, and an English language translation of Alexei Nemov's autobiography, please.